The deployment of Microsoft teams is the first step towards viable benefits. This is followed by the step of quality adoption and a change roll out. It does not make sense for an organization to depend upon organic approach towards MS teams as due to bad experiences there is a possibility of bad user experience. Hence when it comes to office 365 adoption there is a need for a controlled approach. There is a need to be aware about controlled and organic approach to adoption. There is a need for a stable work environment that encourages harmonious working relationship. Let us understand things in details
A couple of approaches relating to team adoption
It is obvious that Microsoft team is user friendly and there are a couple of ways where an organization can plan to implement the same.
MS teams by default is known to provide free collaboration to everyone. If you have planned to lease MS teams in your organization without any form of protocols then the user may end up using the platform in any manner that they want. Once there is freedom to explore and experiment with teams there is an adoption to teams at an organic level.
In a controlled approach there is an organizational boundary in place across the teams environment as this regulates the entire workspace. This goes on to encourage quality user behaviour to overcome any sort of inconsistency in the team.
The reasons for the confusion and chaos when it comes to MS teams adoption
An organic growth of MS teams is a positive trait towards their adoption success. But teams can multiply if there are a number of users in an organization. This may lead to a situation where proliferation of content occurs and the entire ecosystem may get over loaded with unnecessary teams. There could be a situation where the teams could have the same name. O 365 adoption has to be done with a proper planned module.
Slowly the users may reach out to a point, where they are not able to locate what they need and due to frustration may stop using Teams. There is a possibility they could switch over to secure apps for accomplishing their tasks that may lead to further security risks. Even issues of content misuse and theft may arise.
With a proper set of governance, a right balance of the productivity and security of the platform is achieved. A reason is that teams does not have a central governance panel. In addition governance in MS teams is manual that may lead to unnecessary wastage of time. So as to overcome this hurdle there is a need to streamline the governance process where you need to automate the platform. Even admin solutions have to be streamlined where the stain on the IT department is reduced.
Automation is a feature that is going to reduce possibility of human errors considerably. You are able to regulate teams and sites in a better way.
Hi, I am Adam Smith, Admin Of TechSketcher, Creative blogger and Digital Marketer.